The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case deciding the future of campaign finance — these are the standout moments.
As the United States moves closer to its founders’ intent to not infringe on citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms, ...
Last week, our friends at The Federalist ran a couple of pieces — one by Brianna Lyman and the other by John Daniel Davidson ...
At a time of attacks on the judicial system, a coalition of former state chief justices around the country has organized to ...
This week’s top stories include Texas’ redrawn map, Trump’s immigration agenda, national park access, and growing DEI ...
Richard Herman says the Ohio senator's proposal to ban dual citizenship would face insurmountable constitutional obstacles ...
The Department of Homeland Security has called fake reports of American citizens being detained. These Californians -- all ...
Some Republicans only want citizens included in population counts used to draw political districts. In Texas, that raises important questions about power and representation.
A legal fight could restore the state’s power to set its own limits on contributions to super PACs and encourage public financing.
In practice, that has meant more expert, technocratic leadership. It has meant more corporate regulation than Republicans ...
The Supreme Court could loosen restrictions on how much political parties can spend in cooperation with candidates.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, expected by summer 2026, will determine whether the 14th Amendment secures what one brief calls a ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback