Conclusions About Intelligent Design: Intelligent Design is fundamentally religious. This conclusion is based primarily on ID leaders' and their supporters' views of it as stated in their own words, ...

In response to Friday?s editorial on intelligent design (CT, Nov. 11) there is glaring problem that I must address. The editorial claims that I.D. is a theory, but there is a major distinction between ...

A new study asks why the ID movement hasn’t left a more enduring mark on scientific or religious thought. Like a brightly burning candle in the wind: That’s how C. W. Howell depicts the brief history ...

While some saw a federal ruling Tuesday as a major blow to the proponents of "intelligent design," a Seattle organization that is one of the movement's key figures slammed the decision as a futile ...

Edward Ted Davis, professor of the history and philosophy of science and director of the Central Pennsylvania Forum for Religion and Science at Messiah College, lectured to close to 100 people on ...

This Festschrift from friends—and a couple of friendly critics—honors Phillip Johnson, the Berkeley law professor whose 1991 publication Darwin on Trial and later books helped intelligent design ...

The presidents of Cornell and Princeton have publicly blasted intelligent design in recent months, while faculty at these universities, as well as at Brown, have been similarly outspoken in their ...

Researcher Howell debuts with a fascinating survey of the intelligent design movement, a late 1980s through early 2000s effort to displace Darwinian evolutionary theory. Religious opponents have long ...

Southern Adventist University welcomes Paul Nelson, PhD, a biology philosopher involved in the intelligent design debate internationally for three decades, to speak for the annual Origins Convocation ...